Legal Opinion
Sullo v. Luysterborghs
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 10, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The evidence produced at the trial was in sharp conflict. The court chose to believe the testimony offered in behalf of the plaintiff. The defendants seek corrections in the finding which would in effect substitute the defendants’ version of what happened for the facts found by the court. Obviously we cannot do this. The finding, pared down to present the only real issue raised in the appeal, is as follows: The plaintiff conducts a real estate and loan business in New Haven. The defendants owned real estate located in that city. They listed it for sale, at a price of $3500, with the Beazley…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Canfield v. SheketoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Summa v. DereskiawiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Cassidy v. CongdonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Metz v. Hvass Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Merwin v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Webster Trust v. RolyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Bergin v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.