Summa v. Dereskiawicz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover a commission for securing a purchaser of the defendant’s real estate, brought by appeal of the plaintiff to the District Court of Waterbury and tried to the jury before Cowell, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $100, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.
Most of the assignments of error are not well made. The record is silent concerning the subject-matter of one presenting a question as to the jurisdiction of the court.
Other assignments, to the effect that the court erred in its rulings upon the admission of testimony, and in certain remarks made in the presence of the jury during the progress of the trial, as set forth in the transcript of testimony sent up in connection with the appeal, either under § 797 of the General Statutes or for the purpose of assigning error in the denial of a motion for a new trial for verdict against evidence, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Dennison v. Waterville Cutlery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Cadwell v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Zimmerman v. GarveySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
3Cited by17 opinions
- Collins v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Farrington v. CheponisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Wladyka. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- City Builders Finance Co. v. StahlSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.