Legal Opinion
Merwin v. Beardsley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 14, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of the defendant’s real estate.
With such corrections of the finding as we find the defendant entitled to, the facts necessary for the determination of the issues are as follows: The plaintiff was a New Haven real estate broker, which fact the defendant knew. The defendant owned real estate in New Haven. Early in 1945, the Lombardis, former clients of the plaintiff, asked him to find a place for them to live. He was unable to find an apartment and showed them several properties which he thought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Summa v. DereskiawiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Butler v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Segnitz v. A. Grossenbach Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Clark v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Elmendorf v. PoprockiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Bergin v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Carlona v. Progressive Sch, PhotographyConnecticut Superior Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.