Bergin v. Gray

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment in favor of the defendant in their action for a real estate broker’s commission. They seek extensive corrections of the finding in an effort to substitute their version of the transaction for that of the defendant. The finding was made upon conflicting testimony and is supported by the evidence. It must stand.

The essential facts are these: The plaintiff Bergin was an insurance adjuster. The plaintiff Bowes was a title searcher. Neither was primarily engaged in the real estate business. The defendant owned a house in Waterbury which he wanted to…