Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Congdon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 15, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a commission as a real-estate broker based upon the sale of a farm in Oxford by the defendants Palmer and Watson, executors and trustees under the will of Caroline H. Palmer, to the defendant Congdon. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant Congdon but against the other defendants. The present appeal is taken by them from the refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdict against them, which they claim to have had no reasonable support in the evidence. There was no antecedent employment of the plaintiff by them and her right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Canfield v. SheketoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Summa v. DereskiawiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Metz v. Hvass Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Sullo v. LuysterborghsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Merwin v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Bergin v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API