Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Sheketoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

This case presents the question whether the action of the trial court, in setting aside the verdict of the jury, was justified. Included in the record is a transcript of the entire evidence, a study of which shows that the conclusion of the jury was reached upon testimony which, at many points, was conflicting.

The action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict of the jury is entitled to great weight. Schulte, Inc. v. Hewitt Grocery Co., 101 Conn. 750, 751, 125 Atl. 365. It is also true that where the conclusion of a jury is reached, upon conflicting evidence, that conclusion should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weinhouse v. CroninSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Skaling v. SheedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Schulte, Inc. v. Hewitt Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. L'Heureux v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. DeLahunta v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Simon Service Incorporated v. MitchellNevada Supreme Court · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API