Legal Opinion

State v. Stockfleth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1991No. CC 86-3-30485, CC 86-3-30486, CC 86-3-30488 CA A44567 (Control), CA A45133 SC S36769, SC S36775PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

These consolidated cases involve the sufficiency of two successive wiretap orders. Defendants are charged with arson, felony murder, conspiracy to commit arson, theft, attempted theft, and conspiracy to commit theft. The trial court suppressed the conversations obtained through the two orders, and the state appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed, after which the state petitioned for review. 1 2We affirm, in part on other grounds.

Odie’s Tavern in Elgin, Oregon, was damaged by a fire of uncertain origin on September 29, 1985. On January 27, 1986, an explosion and fire destroyed the tavern and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Handy v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. LombardoIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API