Legal Opinion
United States v. Giordano
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 13, 1974No. 72-1057PublishedCited by 854 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Title III-of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act UU1968, 82 Stat. 211-225, 18 U. S. C.' §§ 2510-2520, prescribes the procedure for securing judicial authority to intercept wire communications in the investigation of specified serious offenses. The Court must here determine whether the Government sufficiently complied with the required application procedures in this case and whether, if not, evidence obtained as a result of such surveillance, under a court order based on the applications, is admissible at the criminal trial of those whose conversations were overheard. In particular,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Richard Becker and Jack EisenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Richard Michael King, AKA Richard HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by854 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
849 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.