Legal Opinion

Handy v. Lane County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2016No. CC 161213685; CA A153507; SC S063725PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration consistent with this decision.

KISTLER, J.

Oregon’s public meetings law provides that a quorum of a public entity’s governing body “may not meet in private for the purpose of deciding on or deliberating toward a decision.” ORS 192.630(2). Plaintiff filed this action claiming, among other things, that a quorum of the Lane County commissioners had violated that provision by engaging in a series of private communications to decide whether to comply…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Lampos v. Bazar, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. StockflethOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Handy v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Davoodian v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Tri-County Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Baldwin v. SeidaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Assn. v. ChinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Cider Riot, LLC v. Patriot Prayer USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API