Legal Opinion

State v. Cooper

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1994No. DC 91-2249-C; CA A72530; SC S40539PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether a city police officer who investigates charges of a state crime and charges a defendant with that crime may be designated by the state in a state criminal trial based on this charge as a representative of the state under the second exception to the rule governing exclusion of witnesses that is stated in OEC 615. Stating that exception, OEC 615(2) in part provides:

“At the request of a party the court may order witnesses excluded until the time of final argument, and it may make the order of its own motion. This rule does not authorize exclusion of * *…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. United States v. Jessie BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Narberto Angelo Portomene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. Guzman/HecklerOregon Supreme Court · 2019

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API