Legal Opinion

Pamplin v. Victoria

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1994No. CC 16-91-06925; CA A75958; SC S40867PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

This case involves the application of ORCP 46 B(2)(c), which provides in part:

“If a party * * * fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, * * * the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, including among others, the following:

iiijj s»i # $ #

“(c) An order * * * dismissing the action or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party[.]”

We hold that a trial court that imposes the sanction of dismissal under ORCP 46 B(2)(c) must make findings of fact and must explain why that sanction is ‘…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. StockflethOregon Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API