Legal Opinion
Pamplin v. Victoria
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1994No. CC 16-91-06925; CA A75958; SC S40867PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
This case involves the application of ORCP 46 B(2)(c), which provides in part:
“If a party * * * fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery, * * * the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, including among others, the following:
iiijj s»i # $ #
“(c) An order * * * dismissing the action or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party[.]”
We hold that a trial court that imposes the sanction of dismissal under ORCP 46 B(2)(c) must make findings of fact and must explain why that sanction is ‘…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. StockflethOregon Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.