Legal Opinion
Aposporos v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 2002No. SC 16450PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Maria Aposporos and Ellen Begetis, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their request for a permanent injunction prohibiting condemnation proceedings by the defendants, the urban redevelopment commission of the city of Stamford (commission) and the city of Stamford (city). On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly: (1) concluded that the defendants had complied with the time requirements of General Statutes § 8-128; (2) concluded that the defendants had complied with the conditions imposed by the local legislative body…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Sheehan v. AltschulerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Maritime Ventures, LLC v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Investment Associates v. Summit Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.