Legal Opinion
Investment Associates v. Summit Associates, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 22, 2011No. AC 32227PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
This appeal arises from the application of 2009 legislation creating a new procedure enabling the enforcement of Connecticut judgments in foreign jurisdictions. The defendant Joseph D. Lancia appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion to revive a judgment filed by the plaintiff, Investment Associates, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-598 (c).1 On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court *195(1) lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the motion to revive because the plaintiff, a joint venture, had no standing, (2) lacked personal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Walsh v. JodoinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- American Progressive Life & Health Insurance Co. of New York v. Better Benefits, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- REID AND RIEGE, PC v. BulakitesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Schaghticoke Indian Tribe v. RostConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SnaiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Investment Associates v. Summit Investment Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012