Legal Opinion
Caruso v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 5, 2007No. SC 18012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The plaintiff, Christopher Caruso, brought this action pursuant to General Statutes § 9-329a (a),1 claiming, inter alia, that the defendant Santa Ayala, the Democratic registrar of voters for the city of *796Bridgeport (city), had violated certain election statutes before, during and after the September 11, 2007 Democratic primary for the office of the mayor of the city.2 After an expedited hearing, the trial court rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff then brought an appeal.3 At the same time, the plaintiff filed in this *797court a motion to stay pursuant to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Miller v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Aposporos v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Lazar v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Simmons-Cook v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Simmons-Cook v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007