Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. Altschuler
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1961PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The plaintiffs instituted this action for a declaratory judgment concerning redevelopment in the town of West Haven. The answers to numerous questions were sought. The court answered the questions and in doing so sustained the redevelopment program. The plaintiffs have appealed.
A determination concerning (1) the legality of the creation of the redevelopment agency, (2) the validity of the redevelopment plan under which the agency purported to act, and (3) the legality of the contract to sell the area in question to the defendant Arthur Gosselin, a redeveloper, is sufficiently determinative of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- State v. McCookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Shelton v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- John J. Brennan Construction Corporation, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Broadriver, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.