Legal Opinion
Pet Car Products, Inc. v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 2, 1962PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAloobit, J.
The plaintiff, owner of real estate within an area designated by the New Haven Redevelopment Agency as the Wooster Square redevelopment and renewal area, brought this action to enjoin the agency and the city of New Haven from proceeding further to acquire its property. The clerk of the Superior Court at New Haven was made a defendant because of his statutory duty to issue a certificate of tailing in connection with the condemnation proceedings sought to be enjoined. General Statutes § 8-129. The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for the defendants and from the denial of a motion to open…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- McCulloch v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Cichy v. KostykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.