Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Duck Creek Irr. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1952No. 7660PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

The controversy herein is over rights to the water of Duck Creek, just south of Benjamin, Utah County. The trial court decreed to the appellant Duck Creek Irrigation Company a basic flow of two second feet and ordered the rest of the stream divided between the parties: 300/368 to appellant and 68/368 to respondent during the irrigation season; and 400/568 to appellant and 168/568 to the respondent during the non-irrigation season. The decree also awarded the plaintiff the right to use certain ditches owned by the Duck Creek Irrigation Company or by individuals who are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Patterson v. RyanUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Jensen v. Birch Creek Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Eskelsen v. Town of PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Daniels Irrigation Co. v. Daniel Summit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Little v. Greene & Weed InvestmentUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District v. GaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API