Weber Basin Water Conservancy District v. Gailey
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
A rehearing was granted in this case to give further consideration to this important question with respect to water diversion: Does an owner of land adjacent to a stream have the right to insist that the stream continue to flow in its natural channel undiminished for the purpose of maintaining lateral support to keep percolating waters within the soil of his land?
We refer to this case as heretofore reported,1 and in addition thereto, state briefly the facts essential to our further discussion of the problem involved.
Plaintiff, Weber Basin Conservancy District, is engaged in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Justesen v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Stowell v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Bullock v. HanksUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Provo City Corp. v. KnudsenUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. TannerUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. TannerUtah Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.