Legal Opinion

East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. Morgan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1993No. 920125PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff East Jordan Irrigation Company (“East Jordan”) appeals from a grant of summary judgment upholding the state engineer’s decision allowing defendant Pay-son City Corporation (“Payson”), a shareholder in East Jordan, to change the point of diversion of a portion of East Jordan’s water without the company’s consent. We reverse.

East Jordan is a nonprofit mutual water corporation1 owning legal title to certain *311water rights in Utah Lake and the Jordan River. The corporation diverts water from the river and the lake into a canal and delivers it to its 650 shareholders to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jacobucci v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Consolidated Peoples Ditch Co. v. Foothill Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Park v. ALTA DITCH & CANAL COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Badger v. Brooklyn Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API