Legal Opinion

Eskelsen v. Town of Perry

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1991No. 900119PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an interlocutory appeal from a decree entered in a proceeding under section 73-4-24 of the Utah Code. Under the terms of that section, the trial court’s interlocutory decree will control the rights of the parties in and to the water involved until a final decree is entered in the ongoing general adjudication of water rights on the Bear River in northern Utah.

This case presents us with a dispute between appellants Richard M. and Virginia E. Eskelsen (the Eskelsens) and LaNez Norman, and appellee Town of Perry (the Town). Each party claims an interest in water having its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Deseret Live Stock Co. v. HooppianiaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Rocky Ford Irr. Co. v. Kents Lake Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Nephi City v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bishop v. Duck Creek Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  4. Delta Canal Co. v. Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Salt Lake City Corp. v. HaikCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API