Legal Opinion

Daniels Irrigation Co. v. Daniel Summit Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1977No. 14939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff brought an action in two counts 1) to appeal the state engineer’s decision approving defendants’ change application which asserted an irrigation right and 2) to quiet title to the waters of Hobble Creek.

The case was tried to the Court, sitting without a jury, and it dismissed the first count as not being timely prosecuted. 1 As to count two, it declined to determine thé rights of use of the respective parties deeming such issues to be res judicata, and further determined defendants’ use of water does not interfere with plaintiff’s.

Plaintiff appeals only from the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Albuquerque v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Speer v. StephensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. United States v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Utah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Church v. Meadow Springs Ranch Corp., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Jensen v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Crafts v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Crafts v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API