Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
This started as a suit in equity, brought by the plaintiff irrigation companies to enforce a previous decree of the District Court of Cache County in a case entitled Utah Power and Light Co. v. Richmond Irrigation Company. That decree, commonly known as the Kimball Decree, was entered February 21,1922. It purported to be a general adjudication of all water rights in Little Bear River. However, some of the defendants in the present suit were not bound by the Kimball Decree because neither they nor their predecessors were made parties to it. The plaintiffs base their claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Morris v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1906
- Deseret Live Stock Co. v. HooppianiaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Hammond v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Smithfield West Bench Irr. Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Mountain Home Irrigation District v. DuffyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- College Irrigation Co. v. Logan River & Blacksmith Fork Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.