Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Ryan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1910No. 2099PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fifth District; Hon. Joshua Greenwood, Judge. Action by Edward Patterson, as administrator of John Patterson, deceased, against John Eyan. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This action was brought by appellant, as administrator, of the estate of one John Patterson, deceased, to quiet title to the use of the water flowing from certain springs known as the Potsum Pah springs, situate in Pine Grove Valley, Beaver County, Utah.

The facts which we deem material, as developed at the trial, in substance, are: That the land on which the springs in question are situated is arid, and up to the time that this action was commenced continued to be unsurveyed public domain. In the year 1896 one Thomas McCune filed a desert entry on the lands surrounding the said springs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Santa Paula Water Works v. PeraltaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Smith v. LoganNevada Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roy Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Steptoe Live Stock Co. v. GulleyNevada Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API