State ex rel. Miller v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Daniel Miller the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court of Hennepin county and the Honorable John H. Steele, one of the judges thereof, to review the proceedings in that court under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by relator, as employee, against The Journal Printing Company, as employer.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Certiorari to review a judgment dismissing a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The judgment recites that, when the cause came on for hearing, defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted, on the ground that the matter alleged in plaintiff’s complaint showed on its face that the accident, on account of which compensation was sought, did not arise out of or in the course of plaintiff’s employment. The facts stated in the complaint are in substance these: Plaintiff, 17 years old, was in the employ of defendant as a messenger at $7 per week. In this work he was provided with car fare…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Beaudry v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. RutzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.