Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1915No. Nos. 19,221-(310)PublishedCited by 67 opinions

Upon the relation of the Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. this court granted a writ of certiorari directed to the judges and clerk of the district court for St. Louis county to review the proceedings in the matter of compensation for injury to Charles DeCóok, an employee of relator, whereby he was granted, Cant, L, compensation for personal injuries at the rate of $8.10 per week for a period of 100 weeks.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review the findings and judgment of the district court in proceeding therein to determine the right of an injured servant to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (chapter 467, p. 675, Laws 1913). Findings were made to the effect that the servant lost the sight in one eye through an accidental injury arising, within the meaning of the act, out of and in the course of employment, and judgment was entered against relator. If the injury arose out of and in the course of the employment the judgment is right.

The injured servant, Charles DeCook, had worked for relator, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hopkins v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API