Legal Opinion

Beaudry v. Watkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Charles E. Beaudry presented'his claim for compensation for the death of Gordon Beaudry while in the employ of William H. Watkins and Byron D. Rad-cliff, copartners. From an order awarding compensation, defendants bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The facts are not complicated. On April 29, 1914, and prior thereto, Gordon Beaudry, nearly 15 years of age, was employed by Watkins & Radcliffe as a delivery boy, and he was furnished a bicycle with which to do his work. On that date he was to make *446a delivery on Cass avenue. Permission was given him to get his luncheon at home, No. 997 Theodore street, and he was then to call for a package and return to the store. One of his employers testified he—

“asked my permission to go. home to lunch from Theodore street, or whatever the call back might be. I reluctantly gave him permission to make that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Clem v. Chalmers Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gignac v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Clifton v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Speas v. Boone CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Consolidated Underwriters v. BreedloveTexas Supreme Court · 1924

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API