Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
A writ of certiorari brings before us an order of tie industrial commission denying relator’s claim for compensation for an injury sustained on October 31, 1925, while employed by tie J. A. McNulty Company.
Under contracts witi railroad companies operating in St. Paul and Minneapolis, tie employer removes grain doors from cars unloaded at elevators in tie two cities and “coopers” cars to be loaded at tie elevators. It employed a number of men to do tie work, relator being one of them. His working hours were from 7:30 a. m. to 4 p. m. On tie day of tie accident, in response to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Buvia v. Oscar Daniels Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Snyder v. General Paper CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Pohler v. T. W. Snow Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Roman v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.