Legal Opinion

Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1924No. 23,904PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Gudrund Novack was, at the age of 16 years and a few months, an employe of Montgomery, Ward & Company in St. Paul. She began her work at 8 o’clock a. m. She was required to use a freight elevator in going to and from the eighth floor where she worked. The elevator was not guarded as provided by law; it was unlawfully used. At 7:40 o’clock a. m. February 1, 1928, while riding in said elevator, and because it was not guarded as provided by law, she was severely injured, resulting in the loss of one leg. Her other leg was broken and she was otherwise severely injured. These statements are made…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. White v. E. T. Slattery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Landeen v. Toole County Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Smith.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API