Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Plaintiff brought suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act against the defendant Majestic Coal Company, as employer, and its insurance carrier, Maryland Casualty Company, and recovered judgment as for a permanent total disability and for the maximum .amount provided by section 13 and subsections “d,” “e,” and “h” thereof, providing for each totally dependent child. Gen. Acts 1919, pp. 206, 214, 215, 217.
The injury sustained July 22, 1920, was at a time when plaintiff was in the employment of defendant Majestic Coal Company. His spinal column was fractured by rock falling from the roof of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Ryalls v. Mechanics' MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.