Salters v. Uhlir
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Plaintiffs had a verdict in a personal injury case. Defendants’ alternative motion, made on the minutes of the court, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial ivas denied. Subsequently defendants procured a transcript and made a motion for leave to renew and supplement the original motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a neiv trial. Additional assignments of error were set forth. No formal motion was made for leave to vacate the former order denying the motion. The court, after having read the transcript, decided that it had been mistaken in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State ex rel. Tolversen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Patterson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State ex rel. Klemer v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Asplund v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Salters v. UhlirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940