Legal Opinion

Cox v. Selover

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1925No. 25,162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 205 N.W. 691. Application for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the district court granting defendant's motion for a new trial for the reason that the verdict of the jury was not justified by the evidence.

Subdivision 4, § 9498, G. S. 1923, authorizes an appeal from an order granting a new trial when the order is based exclusively on errors occurring at the trial, but an appeal from an order granting a new trial for insufficiency of evidence is allowed only when a second verdict is set aside on that ground. We think it is wholly within the discretion of the trial court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Woodrow v. ToblerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Asplund v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Edelstein v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API