Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Hall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1923No. 23,136PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The will of Charlotte C. Hall was admitted to probate May 20, 1021. Her husband, Lucius F. Hall, had consented to the will in writing, but, when it was presented for probate, filed a written repudiation of such consent, and a notice that he renounced and refused to accept the provision made for him in the will, and, in lieu thereof, elected to take the share of the estate allowed him by the statute. Immediately after the will had been admitted to probate, he filed a second instrument to the same effect. The executor made a motion to strike these documents from the files. As a result…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knutsen v. KrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Krey v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Sisters of the Order of St. Benedict v. WillrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Kelly v. Probate Court ofSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. In Re Estate of BettsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. In Re Estate of FirleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Melstrom v. TerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API