Legal Opinion

Salters v. Uhlir

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 21, 1940No. 32,328PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Originally this action was started in December, 1934, to recover property damage inflicted in a collision. Plaintiffs recovered a verdict, and a new trial was granted. Salters v. Uhlir, 196 Minn. 541, 265 N. W. 333. On the second trial a verdict for defendants was directed when plaintiffs rested on order of the court. The motion for a new trial was denied.

The collision took place in midafternoon on September 28, 1934, on highway No. 169. Plaintiffs’ vehicle was a one-and-one-half ton tractor and semitrailer about 32 feet in length. Defendant Myles Uhlir was the owner of a 1931…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abbett v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Knudson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Coffman v. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Spencer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Behr v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Shockman v. Union Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Ballweber v. KleistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Fisher v. EdbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API