Asplund v. Brown
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
This cause is before us on the motion of plaintiffs to quash a Avrit of certiorari issued on the petition of defendants. The latter by that Avrit seek revieAv of an order, made under the statute, 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9886, directing defendants to allow plain-. tiffs an inspection of books, correspondence, records, and other documents.
We need not now follow the far-flung allegations of the pleadings, other than to make a brief summary of those necessary to an understanding of the decision. Plaintiffs profess to sue for themselves and other members of General Drivers Union,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Davis v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Tolversen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Cox v. SeloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Purdy v. NordquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- In Re Estate and Guardianships of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.