Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Dorsey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1950No. 35,119, 35,126PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
230 Minn. 279 (1950)
DIANA MAY CHAPMAN
v.
HAROLD A. DORSEY.[1]
Nos. 35,119, 35,126.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
February 17, 1950.
Leslie C. Scholle, Robert J. Phillips, and Bruce K. Newell, for appellant-relator.
Ryan, Ryan, Ryan & Ebert, for respondent.
MATSON, JUSTICE.
Defendant, by means of both appeal and writ of certiorari, seeks a review of an order of the trial court denying his motion for the joinder of additional parties defendant pursuant to M.S.A. 540.16. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the appeal and quash the writ presents the following issues:(1) Is an order denying a motion made…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McFarlan v. Fowler Bank City Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Hensley v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Schuster v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.