Legal Opinion
Oden v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1994No. A058988PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, P. J.
A plaintiff class of pensioners under the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and its class representatives obtained judgment directing issuance of a writ of mandate commanding the respondent class of more than 1,350 California public agencies and the Board of Administration of PERS to increase pensioners’ retirement allowances.
The trial court judgment rests on an interpretation of Government Code section 20022’s definition of “compensation,” upon which pension contributions and allowances are calculated. “Compensation” is defined to include an employer “pick up”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Pomona Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of PomonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Hudson v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ETC.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. California Milk Producers Advisory BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.