Hudson v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ETC.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Appellants are the former fire chief, division fire chief, police chief, and substation superintendent of the electric utility division of the City of Colton (City). The City permitted appellants to convert employer-paid benefits, such as health and life insurance, to salary increases if they agreed to retire within 12 months. The purpose of the conversions was to increase appellants’ final year compensation so they would receive greater retirement benefits under the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS).
PERS, however, refused to include the salary increases in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bernard v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Alameda Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Alameda Cnty. Employees' Ret. Assn., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.