Legal Opinion
Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 2010No. B214685PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
The Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System (LACERS) appeals from a judgment in favor of Abraham Khan (Khan) granting his petition for writ of mandate compelling LACERS to approve his *103request for concurrent deferred retirement benefits with LACERS and the Judges’ Retirement System (JRS).1 The sole issue on appeal is whether LACERS and JRS have reciprocity provisions such that Khan, a judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County who had worked for the City of Los Angeles (City) as a city attorney, may retire from LACERS at his higher judicial salary. We conclude…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- American Coatings Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Rando v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Outfitter Properties, LLC v. Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. WahidiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Squire v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.