Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Grant Thornton International Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2025PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Richard Lane Hopkins claims that Grant Thornton LLP interfered with his rights to leave without pay for a serious medical condition and also retaliated against him for asking for such leave by firing him. Mr. Hopkins misperceives his legal rights and the standards that pertain to his claims. Finding that his claims have no merit, the Court will grant summary judgment to Grant Thornton.
I. FACTS
Mr. Hopkins started working for Grant Thornton LLP 1 in September 2007 as a Senior Consultant with the Global…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomas v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Miles v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- ['DAVIS v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Leyden v. American Accreditation Healthcare commission/uracDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Holloway v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.