Legal Opinion

McLauchlan v. Bonynge

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1911No. Civ. No. 833PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to quiet title to real estate. The court found in favor of the validity of certain tax proceedings and tax deeds issued thereunder by virtue of which defendants asserted title to the property in controversy, and gave judgment for defendants. Thereafter, the court made an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial “because of the insufficiency of description in the tax deeds and assessments.” Defendants appeal from this order.

The description of the property as contained in both the assessment-roll and deeds under which defendants claim title is as follows: “In Los Angeles city,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Fox v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Chapman v. ZoberleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Edwards v. City of Santa PaulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Corona Unified School District v. VejarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Rexon v. GaffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Warden v. BrandesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API