Legal Opinion

Warden v. Brandes

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1930No. Docket No. 3895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff commenced this action to quiet her title to “Lot Seventy-eight of Tract 1889 as per Map recorded in Book 21, page 29 of Maps, Records of Los Angeles County.” The defendant answered denying the plaintiff’s ownership and alleged title in herself.

At the close of plaintiff’s ease the defendant moved for a nonsuit which was granted and judgment of nonsuit was thereupon entered. The plaintiff appeals therefrom.

In support of her claim of title plaintiff offered and the court received in evidence records of proceedings of the city of Los Angeles, creating a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Thompson v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Green v. De Los PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. McLauchlan v. BonyngeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rexon v. GaffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. District Bond Co. v. HillikerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API