Legal Opinion

Thompson v. McKenna

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1913No. Civ. No. 1329PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to quiet title to land.

The facts of the case are as follows: On November 10, 1890, John McKenna and Norah Anna McKenna were husband and wife. Plaintiff is the daughter of Norah Anna McKenna by a former husband, and half-sister to defendant J. Irving Mc-Kenna, who is the son of John and Norah Anna McKenna. On November 10, 1890, John McKenna, who at the time resided with his family on a ranch in Ventura County, executed a deed of gift to his wife, Norah Anna McKenna, purporting to convey the property to her. On May 23, 1891, John McKenna died intestate, leaving as his heirs his widow and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Fox v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Feliz v. FelizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Law v. People ex rel. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API