Legal Opinion

Sultani v. Leuthy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 1997No. 38505-4-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kennedy, A.C.J.

Todd Shrewsbury and Lance Pollard appeal the trial court’s order awarding attorney fees to Waheed Sultani under Rule 7.3 of the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR). The appellants contend that the fee award was erroneous under the facts of this case because neither was a party who failed to improve his position on the trial de novo. We agree and reverse the trial court’s judgment in favor of Sultani. Because our holding is dispositive of this appeal, we need not reach the appellants’ additional argument that Shrewsbury, who did not appeal the arbitration award, was not subject to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Wilkerson v. United Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Fernandes v. MockridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yoon v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. Tran v. Yue Han YuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Dolphus Mcgill v. James BeardonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Hutson v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Huntington v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API