Legal Opinion

Dolphus Mcgill v. James Beardon

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 11, 2016No. 72926-8-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 — MAR 7.3 and RCW 7.06.060U) 1 require that the superior court assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against a party who asks for a trial de novo and does not improve his or her position at trial. Here, the parties disagree about how to determine if Dolphus McGill improved his position at a trial de novo.

¶2 James Bearden sued McGill for damages caused by an auto accident. An arbitrator awarded Bearden $44,000.00 in compensatory damages and $1,187.00 in statutory costs, for a total arbitration award of $45,187.00. McGill requested a trial de novo. The jury awarded Bearden less in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. COSMOPOLITAN ENG. GROUP v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cosmopolitan Engineering Group, Inc. v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bearden v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API