Dolphus Mcgill v. James Beardon
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
¶1 — MAR 7.3 and RCW 7.06.060U) 1 require that the superior court assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against a party who asks for a trial de novo and does not improve his or her position at trial. Here, the parties disagree about how to determine if Dolphus McGill improved his position at a trial de novo.
¶2 James Bearden sued McGill for damages caused by an auto accident. An arbitrator awarded Bearden $44,000.00 in compensatory damages and $1,187.00 in statutory costs, for a total arbitration award of $45,187.00. McGill requested a trial de novo. The jury awarded Bearden less in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- COSMOPOLITAN ENG. GROUP v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Cosmopolitan Engineering Group, Inc. v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bearden v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Bearden v. McGillWashington Supreme Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.