Legal Opinion

Tran v. Yue Han Yu

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 14, 2003No. 51218-8-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

An arbitrator awarded $14,675 in damages to the plaintiff, Mei Tran (Tran). The defendant, Yue Han Yu (Yu), requested a trial de novo. Following trial, the jury awarded $13,375 in damages to Tran. Tran moved for entry of judgment and also sought attorney fees under CR 37, statutory costs and attorney fees under Mandatory Arbitration Rule (MAR) 7.3. The trial court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict, granted Tran’s motion for CR 37 sanctions and statutory costs, but denied Tran’s request for attorney fees under MAR 7.3. On appeal, Tran contends that the trial court erred in denying her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Niccum v. EnquistWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Miller v. Paul M. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Dolphus Mcgill v. James BeardonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Hutson v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Niccum v. EnquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API