Legal Opinion

Glover v. Tacoma General Hospital

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1983No. 48506-2PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, J. *

Petitioner challenges a superior court judge's denial of summary judgment and approval of a settlement pursuant to the terms of Washington's contribution statute, RCW 4.22.040-.920. The case presents issues of first impression regarding the tort reform act, Laws of 1981, ch. 27 (hereinafter the Act). For the reasons discussed below, we remand for entry of partial summary judgment on the issue of vicarious liability and for trial on the independent liability claim. Furthermore, we find that the set tlement was reasonable, given the factors outlined in this opinion.

I

The case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Adamski v. Tacoma General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wenatchee Wenoka Growers Ass'n v. Krack Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Besel v. Viking InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API