Legal Opinion

Yoon v. Keeling

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 5, 1998No. 22229-9-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

— Honey Fernau appeals a trial court order requiring her to pay attorney fees to codefendant Henry Keeling. She contends that she improved her position at the trial de novo and, thus, is not liable for fees pursuant to MAR 7.3. But the jury held Fernau responsible for a greater percentage of fault than did the arbitrator in his award. We hold that, notwithstanding an intervening settlement with the plaintiff that reduced the dollar amount of the award, Fernau did not improve her position “on the trial de novo.” Thus, we affirm.

FACTS

Following mandatory arbitration, the arbitrator entered an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Arment v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Wilkerson v. United Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Sultani v. LeuthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Tribble v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Tribble v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CAS. INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Tran v. Yue Han YuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Miller v. Paul M. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API