Legal Opinion

Perkins Coie v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 27, 1997No. 36964-4-IPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

May a party who arbitrates claims under the Superior Court Mandatory Arbitration Rules request a trial de novo of less than all the issues of fact and law that were arbitrated? We hold that a party may not so limit a request for a trial de novo. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s orders and remand this case for further proceedings.

The Perkins Coie (Perkins) law firm brought this action against Richard and Chris Williams and their daughter, Stephanie Williams. The firm sought to recover payment for legal services incurred during its representation of Stephanie in a personal injury…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mellor v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API