Hutson v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Rehrig International, Inc., appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorney fees. Under MAR 7.3, the party requesting a trial de novo must pay attorney fees if that party does not improve its position at the trial de novo. Rehrig argues that its codefendant, Costco Wholesale Corporation, did not improve its position because both the arbitrator and the jury found that Rehrig was not liable on the plaintiff’s claim. Costco argues that it *334improved its position because its liability to the plaintiff was reduced by $20,000. We hold that Costco did improve its position and affirm the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Cormar, Ltd. v. SauroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Dolphus Mcgill v. James BeardonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Huntington v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Kenneth Huntington, V Jennifer A. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.