Legal Opinion
E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The material facts found so far as necessary to present the determining issue in this case may be stated as follows: The plaintiff operates a moving picture theater in Hartford. It employed two projectionists and two assistant projectionists, none of whom, previous to 1937, were members of any union. After discussion among themselves they decided to join a union affiliated with the American Federation of Labor and ultimately did so. While their applications for membership were pending, a union connected with the American Federation was organized in Hartford for employees engaged in theatrical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- M. Steinert & Sons Co. v. TagenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Moore Drop Forging Co. v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Quinlivan v. Dail-Overland Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- West Allis Foundry Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Swart v. HustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Kenmike Theatre, Inc. v. Moving Picture Operators, Local 304Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Motion Picture Machine Projectionists Protective Union v. Rialto Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1941
- H. O. Canfield Co. v. United Construction WorkersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.